this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
472 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (21 children)

Do people seriously think we could "reverse" climate change?

That's not how the climate works.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Lol this is the same argument I've heard from climate change denialists for years: we can't possibly change the climate!

Now doomers are saying the same thing, but even more ridiculously because they almost certainly believe we have changed the climate already.

[–] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think the issue people are arguing is you can't put the genie back in the bottle. You're not going to reform glaciers by choosing to drive an EV. You're not going to stop increasing rates and extremes of floods by turning off the basement lights when not in use.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is not what the article is about at all. I'm not even sure how you would get that from reading the headline alone.

[–] Marx2k@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm talking about the comments, not the article.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

How do you even get that from the comment I was responding to?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)