Yep, you know my life history and personality based on 7 comments. I know how you can buy into anarchism though, you just assume anything that doesn't make sense is just your lack of intelligence not that it might just be a dumb idea that most children could explain the flaws of.

You see the irony there right? No, didn't think so.

And yet you can't explain your shitty idealism but sure, everyone else is wrong and you're the king of earth. Gotcha.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

"smarts", I guess you gave up on that Grammer Nazi shit huh?

"Smarts" is a colloquialism

Yep, you know my life history and personality based on 7 comments

Exactly

And yet you can't explain your shitty idealism

You never asked

everyone else is wrong and you're the king of earth.

Finally someone gets it

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

It's bad Grammer and highly regionalized at that.

So a douche and an anarchist, who could have guessed that combination.

I did.

We got the douche part already, lets take it back a notch before you cut yourself with all that edge.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okie dokie

I'm mostly only a douche to fascists and conservatives and capitalists and liberals and people I disagree with on small things

Not to me you didn't. I went back up the chain and I see you kind of half asked someone else, but not me

Me IRL: 1000006214

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So you're a douche, you could have saved the inane exposition.

I did, you should read again.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13281517

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's not asking for an explanation. You asked a yes/no question. Yes, no laws

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Huh? I initially said "right." Which means "correct"/"yes." You never asked for an explanation. You asked a yes or no question, which I answered, and then complained that I didn't offer an explanation?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn't choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

Anarchism exists yes, that didn't imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

If it's a battle of wit, you're losing.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn't choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

You said "so no laws?" And I said "right." That's pretty clear cut to me. What do you want explained?

you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

Fear not, I'm also part of plenty of other nonsense

If it's a battle of wit, you're losing.

Lol

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Right. Is this your first time encountering an anarchist?

Left. The word you're looking for is correct, right is an affirmation or direction. Nothing, I want you to explain your belief system so you can see it in front of you and go "well that's kinda fuckin stupid huh?.

Undoubtedly so I have no doubt.

Idiots tend to laugh a lot so, par for the course I suppose.

load more comments (6 replies)