this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
143 points (84.5% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 78 points 9 months ago (10 children)

What's the worst that could happen?

Oh

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (9 children)

I don't understand owning a computer that you don't fully control but using prosthetics that can be remotely disabled? This is why we need true open source GPL brain implants.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

This isn’t a prosthetic that was remotely disabled, this is failing hardware that doesn’t have support from the original company which is in the process of going bankrupt.

I get where you’re coming from, and agree. Prosthesis and health devices should absolutely not be remotely controllable by a company. But you can’t really help a company shutting down.

And I highly doubt there are any open source implants which help sure blindness that are ready for prime time.

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But still, if the technology is open, then someone may design some compatible replacement hardware. Imagine some makers community rig a replacement for the blind without carrying about profitability.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That’s one aspect, absolutely.

The other side of that coin though, is if you really want random people tinkering with things directly attached to your body, without having a proper way to test beforehand?

These types of devices need to go through testing before they reach human trials for a reason. While I’m happy to trust security of data and even control of my while home to FOSS communities, I honestly don’t know that I’d trust anonymous individuals online with no skin in the game with my literal body.

[–] learningduck@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, that's a legitimate concern, but letting this technology die along with a dying company is a waste. Imagine it getting brought by some patent trolls who wouldn't do anything with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)