Technology

59693 readers

2402 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

675

Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature (www.engadget.com)

submitted 10 months ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NoRodent@lemmy.world 188 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Well that really sucks because it was often the only way to actually find the content on the page that the Google results "promised". For numerous reasons - sometimes the content simply changes, gets deleted or is made inaccessible because of geo-fencing or the site is straight up broken and so on.

Yes, there's archive.org but believe it or not, not everything is there.

[–] ARk@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

We must archive all the things

[–] eating3645@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I will archive you!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

I would love to archive the comment on archive.org but it seems like a bit of a spammy way to do that...

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)