Selfhosted

40329 readers

368 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Need help understanding how to get around port-forwarding with tailscale (programming.dev)

submitted 9 months ago by Cyno@programming.dev to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't have access to my router and my ISP charges for port forwarding (I think they might have a CGNAT setup?).

I'm trying to work around that since I want to start hosting some apps and game servers from my PC. I'm seeing a lot of talk about tailscale as a possible solution to this but honestly I'm a bit confused with all the options and whether this is actually the proper tool for the job.

Assuming it is, do I go the route of setting up a "tailscale funnel" or a "subnet"? Will other people have to install tailscale too if they want to join my servers? People also mention Netmaker or Cloudflared Tunnel, although it also seems like cloudflare doesn't want their tunnels used for game and media traffic?

The more expensive option I guess would be just paying for protonvp premium since it offers port forwarding in that case, but I'm not sure about performance and whether it's worth it, at that point I might just rent a server instead.

Hoping you folks at self-hosted have more ideas on how can I, well... self host instead of throwing money at the problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frozen@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My ISP says my IP is technically dynamic, but it hasn't changed once in the 6 years I've had their service. But that's for the best, since they're the only choice for symmetrical gigabit and their only option for static IPs is for business accounts.

So I continue to trust that they won't change it. Fingers crossed.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Dynamic IPs don't change very often. Sometimes you can get a new one by restarting your router, which most people don't do very often. But in my experience they stay the same if you don't restart it.

If you do end up with a new IP occasionally, it's typically not too hard to change things to the new one.

[–] commandar@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You can also just spend $10 on a domain name with a registrar that offers dynamic DNS. Offhand, both Namecheap and Cloudflare do. I have no idea what my public IP address is because my router just updates it automatically for me. Plenty of DDNS desktop clients around if your router can't for whatever reason.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Haven't seen mine change in 5 years, lol. Even with modem reboots!

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 9 months ago

Does your ISP sell static IPs? Maybe they are all static?

For an ISP using all public IPs, in the days of dial up they could rent less IPs than customers because people were online at different times. These days the routers are all online 24/7, so it seems odd to me that some ISPs have everyone on public IPs but they aren't static. Probably some technical reason why things don't work how I think they do, but it just feels like a way to sell static IPs as an add-on when it wouldn't cost them anymore to allocate an IP to a customer for the life of the connection.