this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
172 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
172
Sony is erasing digital libraries that were supposed to be accessible “forever” (arstechnica.com)
submitted 9 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sony is erasing digital libraries that were supposed to be accessible “forever”::Casualties afoot as Sony merges Funimation with 2021-acquired Crunchyroll.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The secret is that despite everything on the website saying "buy" to the end user when they're putting in their credit card information, somewhere 18 pages down in the TOS you agree to when making an account there is a provision that they reserve the right to revoke access at any time. It's not truly owning content, it was never YOUR contract. It's theirs.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The secret isn't that the fine print somehow makes it okay.

The secret is that it really is blatantly illegal false advertising, but the regulatory-captured FTC isn't doing it's damn job and the companies know it.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The courts should not tolerate hidden clauses in pages of legalese that literally no one, not even lawyers reads. If you have a misleading claim advertised that the buyer is more likely to see, then your hidden clause is invalidated.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I don't see why they tolerate it. Judges are people too and they know damn well that people can't be expected to read every TOS they're asked to agree to.