Games

16800 readers

572 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Microsoft prepares to take Xbox everywhere (www.theverge.com)

submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They won't. Windows isn't even the best way to play Windows games, anymore. x86 itself might become a suggestion - a legacy bytecode for LLVM to consume.

[–] Corngood@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I do agree with you. The current state of things is pretty great.

I have a phone, laptop, desktop, and steam deck. I control the software that runs on all of them, at least down to the bootloader/kernel. If I want to patch a kernel, I can do it. And aside from the phone, I can probably run the majority of the games that have ever been released (on any platform), on any of them.

I worry about two things in the future:

Will be able to buy modern hardware without the software it runs being restricted?
Will online services used by software be accessible without hardware based attestation?

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I have similar worries. I think there will always be some kind of free hardware, but it might be limited to slower arm or risc-v chips. But I doubt there will even be a situation where you can’t have control.

Your second point is not something I’ve considered, but now I’m worried about it and can totally see that being a thing.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

More services I don't give a shit about would not be surprising.

But a lot of these problems have an obvious answer in legislation.