this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
447 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 62 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (21 children)

It's optical fiber so it's good for miles. Unlikely to be at home for decades but telcos will use it for connecting networks.

Optical fiber is already 100 gigabit so the article comparing it to your home connection is stupid.

So the scientist improved current fiber speed by 10x, not 1.2 million X.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I wonder what non-telco applications will use this

I wonder if something like a sport stadium has video requirements that would get close with HFR 8K video?

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

To be fair, it all trickles down to home users eventually. We're starting to see 10+gbps fiber in enthusiast home networks and internet connections. Small offices are widely adopting 100gbps fiber. It wasn't that long ago that we were adopting 1 gigabit ethernet in home networks, and it won't be long before we see widespread 800+ gigabit fiber.

Streaming video is definitely a big application where more bandwidth will come in handy, I think also transferring large AI models in the 100s of gigabytes may also become a large amount of traffic in the near future.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Man. The tech is so pricey though. 10g switch’s are scary lol

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah. I honestly think 10GbaseT was a mistake, since it fragmented 10gbit and made it so expensive.

The sfp+ switches aren't too bad, here's an 8 port unmanaged for $150: https://www.amazon.com/MokerLink-Support-Bandwidth-Unmanaged-Ethernet/dp/B09W24RZDC/

SFP+ still pretty much requires pcie cards or home-server style hardware to use, but it's pretty accessible. And you can buy 10GbaseT adapters for backwards compatibility for $40.

Some wifi routers are even starting to adopt SFP+, even if it's ungodly expensive. https://www.amazon.se/TP-Link-Deco-BE85-2-pack-Tri-Band-router/dp/B0C5Y46J1W/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)