this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
50 points (94.6% liked)

Fediverse

28480 readers
612 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is by far the most comprehensive analysis of the Threads situation that I have seen. I recommend giving it a read.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Serinus@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

A couple counterpoints. First, there's no such thing as a public secret. They can get our data whether we like it or not. And there's not much difference between sharing your post through boosting vs just sharing a screenshot of your post.

It might be more productive to make a list of demands, rather than black and white defederation. Defederate until they have proper moderation, offer to federate as soon as they take proper action.

[โ€“] spaduf@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's wild to see your first point made so frequently especially in light of the push for advancements in digital rights over the past few years. Having access to your data is by no means equivalent to having rights over it's usage (yes even with regards to showing ads NEXT TO the content) and any conversation that doesn't take that into account is dishonest at best.

Your second point I strongly agree with. The absolute best case scenario here would've been for the existing fediverse to refuse federation unless Meta agreed to some fairly basic terms. It was probably the only time when noncorporate social was going to have any leverage at all. Not necessarily too late but it seems unlikely