this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
488 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (7 children)

They're the only semi-decent (sound quality) company I'm aware of that make earbuds without the little buttplug tips. I seemingly need to stretch out my tight earholes, but I'd prefer if ANY company could make earbuds that aren't just skullcandy+ please.

Taking suggestions if anyone knows of one.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Those seem to mostly have the same shape to the ear part that I'm complaining about currently.

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but it'd be nice to not have to spend what I'm sure isn't a paltry sum when they could just as easily "not" be a cookie cutter copy of literally everything else on the market, in the hope, not promise, that it'll be an improvement.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if apple has a patent on the shape. Probably not enforceable but who's got the money to deal with a lawsuit with apple for 10+ years over headphones?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)