Not The Onion

12358 readers

149 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

376

Spotify CEO Daniel Ek surprised by how much laying off 1,500 employees negatively affected the streaming giant’s operations (fortune.com)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by wanderingmagus@lemm.ee to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/30272690

When Spotify announced its largest-ever round of layoffs in December, CEO Daniel Ek hailed a new age of efficiency at the streaming giant. But four months on, it seems he and his executives weren’t prepared for how tough filling in for 1,500 axed workers would be.

The music streamer enjoyed record quarterly profits of €168 million ($179 million) in the first three months of 2024, enjoying double-digit revenue growth to €3.6 billion ($3.8 billion) in the process.

However, the company failed to hit its guidance on profitability and monthly active user growth.

Edit: Thanks to @Zerlyna@lemmy.world for the paywall-free link: https://archive.ph/wdyDS

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago (4 children)

Nah. It'll be never. So long as they can spend good money to have Mackenzie tell em firing X employees will raise profit .0Y%, they will do it. Because anything else to improve profits would require actual work and investment. And that doesn't show immediate profitability.

[–] Klairabelle@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Believe it not hospital boards are like this too. Profits > quality patient care especially when they're made up of the 'good ole boys'

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

You ought to see what goes on inside the third-party payer corporations.

[–] Klairabelle@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's money grubbing all the way out 🥲

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

You already know