this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
247 points (94.0% liked)

Games

16796 readers
557 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] verysoft@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

True, Epic could have provided good competition, but instead of gaining the trust of potential users and building a feature rich store - they immediately went down the most anti-consumer route they could with exclusive deals and free game bait, all while pretending they are the good buys and Valve are an evil-mega corp. The pot calling the kettle black. So yeah, fuck Epic Games.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The free games system isnt anti consumer. And the exclusives are an industry standard, that steam also is involved in.

You have a laundry list of actual hostile practices, why did you pick the two that arent?

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, steam isn't "also involved" in paying publishers to take their games off of other platforms.

Steam "exclusives" exist because every other platform is too dogshit to bother making a business relationship with.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Exclusives are not paying publishers to remove games from platforms. Those are two completely different things.

If you do not understand that simple fact, you probably shouldnt be wading into this discussion.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, they are. That's what exclusive means.

Only being on one platform because no other platform makes business sense is not an exclusive. An exclusive means an exclusivity contract.

But even if you lie and pretend your version is an "exclusive", it absolutely is not "steam playing the exclusive game", because that unconditionally would require steam actively incentivizing staying off of other platforms.

[–] verysoft@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Don't bother, this guy is just a troll. Look at all his other responses lmao.

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago

Did you call me a troll because I caught you out calling free things anti consumer?

If Im the troll, why did you delete your comment? Dick move dude

[–] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 11 months ago

You let me know when you parse this out