Technology

59589 readers

3077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

394

Small modular nuclear reactors get a reality check in new report (newatlas.com)

submitted 5 months ago by machinin@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

153 comments fedilink hide all child comments

[T]he report's executive summary certainly gets to the heart of their findings.

"The rhetoric from small modular reactor (SMR) advocates is loud and persistent: This time will be different because the cost overruns and schedule delays that have plagued large reactor construction projects will not be repeated with the new designs," says the report. "But the few SMRs that have been built (or have been started) paint a different picture – one that looks startlingly similar to the past. Significant construction delays are still the norm and costs have continued to climb."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (15 children)

Because it’s really cool tech and unlike burning coal, oil and gas it’s CO2 neutral. And alternatives like fusion reactors are still decades away, at least, and we can’t build renewables fast enough either.

In my opinion shutting down all nuclear powerplants was the stupidest thing the government here in Germany has ever done, especially since coal is still being subsidized and our planet isn’t getting any cooler.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 5 months ago (7 children)

None of what you say is false.

None of what you say is enough to make it the right path for the future.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (6 children)

It‘s a better path than fossil fuels and a worse one than renewables.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, so you invest the money in renewables.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

If that’s possible. There are places where neither solar, wind, nor water are viable options to cover all the electricity needs. What do you do then?

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)