If this were true, it would lead to the absurd conclusion that hiring a hitman to kill someone would not make you complicit in the act, because, by your logic “they make their own decisions” regardless of who’s paying them to do what.

again, this is completely disanalagous with buying meat on a shelf.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

Again, you don't get to just say, "No it isn't" over and over again without actually explaining why it's not analogous. That's how basic reason works.

Also, you can put multiple things in one comment so you don't spam the thread.

i’m not making an argument. i’m contradicting yours.

Yes, you're literally just disagreeing with anything I (or anyone else on my side) says, with zero supporting evidence or reason. It's not an argument, just contradiction. It's obvious that's what you're doing, but still hilarious that you would come out and admit it.

wrong. i said it is not causal.

Can you please explain what the difference is between an action being causal of another action vs an action... causing another action to happen?

wrong

Wrong.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

with zero supporting evidence or reason

wrong

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wrong.

[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

wrong

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wrong.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The dumbest timeline 🙄

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)