Technology

59569 readers

3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

298

submitted 3 months ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 112 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

US9421713B2 - Additive manufacturing method for printing three-dimensional parts with purge towers

US9592660B2 - Heated build platform and system for three-dimensional printing methods

US7555357B2 - Method for building three-dimensional objects with extrusion-based layered deposition systems

US9168698B2 - Three-dimensional printer with force detection

US10556381B2 - Three-dimensional printer with force detection

That's like all of 3d printing, that's pretty scary. If they win on all 5, seems like it'd kill consumer 3d printing entirely.

[–] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When I look at these patents all of them seem to be patenting others inventions from years ago. So I hope prior art wins.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which would also strip them of each of those patents.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Stop! I can only get so erect.

load more comments (8 replies)