this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
264 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers
480 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kbal@fedia.io 63 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Disappointing, Germany. How can we trust you to find the best pirate sites when not even thepiratebay.org is on the list?

[–] suzune@ani.social 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They don't block torrents because they like to watch people connect to the nodes and then sue them.

It's always better to use onion routing.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 113 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, stick to VPNs. Don't overload Tor with pirate media. Tor network isn't meant for large data transfers like that.

[–] Staubsaugernasenmann@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I2P could be a suitable alternative for this. Although it is rather slow it still works and you dont have to worry about beeing exposed

[–] endofline@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Pretty much like the original reason why napster has been created. It could resume downloads which in the times of early internet explorer wasn't that guaranteed

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The ones that monitor torrent to sue people are lawyer firms, not the government.

[–] Txmyx@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

The government is also not blocking any sites. Only like 5 ISPs are in the CUII. Many people are not even affected

load more comments (6 replies)