this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
577 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
3825 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anivia@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Or you could just get a Moto tag, which already supports Google FindMy and has centimeter accuracy thanks to UWB

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Not all phones have UWB. On the other hand, they do have Bluetooth.

[–] anivia@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Some phones have UWB. Zero phones have Bluetooth 6.0

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, it hasn't been released yet. Is this your idea of a joke?

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's not a joke. UWB adoption could easily stay ahead of Bluetooth 6 adoption. There's nothing requiring phone manufacturers to always update to the latest Bluetooth, just like there's still not very many 5G mmWave phones available.

It could go either way. Bluetooth 6 might be more familiar for manufacturers to implement, but if the hardware is different to support the accuracy, who knows?

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

"easily"? Please, name one device that has UWB and doesn't include bluetooth.

Besides, if this is included in 6.0 and assuming it does cost much more per chip, where's the harm in having a better feature set? This seems like an incredibly pointless discussion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)