this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
260 points (98.9% liked)

Games

16800 readers
521 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

That's how I feel about it. I don't know if I would buy one but independence from Facebook is a prerequisite. Can these even be used without logging in?

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yes, I have no facebook account. It hasn't been a problem. Other than the logo on the headset, I haven't seen any other downside to it being a meta ptoduct. The money they have put in to make sure they are and remain ahead of everyone else for tech means that until there is an actual downside, I pretty much have to use their headsets. But I will have no trouble jumping ship if there ever is a downside, or if anyone else even comes close to catching up.

[–] Eggyhead@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’ve sunk ungodly amounts of cash to create unrealistic expectations for the VR market. Nobody can compete for the low end, and there’s no way meta is profiting, so what’s their end game?

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Presumably, they want to get everyone used to their environment so that when their hardware lead doesn't mean as much in the future, there will be hesitation to leave. We know they aren't currently doing anything untoward as there is plenty of overlap between paranoid tech experts and people interested in pioneering new tech. Can't hide from them. The software and network traffic has been thouroughly vetted and everything is so far doing exactly what it would need to or purports to do.

As long as you go into it knowing you will be changing platforms at some point in the future and hedge all software purchases against that in your mind, the only remaining downside is whether you can stomache giving them your money.

And if that ever changes, it won't go hidden.

There is also something to be said for the fact that everyone in the Meta community see VR as thriving and growing, and everyone that is outside of it sees VR as stagnating or shrinking. So their money is doing that too presumably.

Their ultimate main goal is also, of course, marrying the tech from VR headsets to the tech from AR glasses. Which will be a true ubiquitous product. Being the first one there will be a huge pay day.