this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
138 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3039 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kender242@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

A poignant quote here

"It was a disaster so bad that a new word, Waldsterben, or “forest death,” was minted to describe the result. All the same species and age, the trees were flattened in storms, ravaged by insects and disease — even the survivors were spindly and weak. Forests were now so tidy and bare they were all but dead. "

[–] classic@fedia.io 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's an interesting, useful analogy. My concern is that, like with nature, many fear the wild. The moment a rewilding of the internet might lead to a negative event, people would run and beg for the reinstament of walled gardens

[–] nix@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

That's a good comparison I hadn't honestly thought of! Thanks

[–] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I was really bummed that Filterworld by Kyle Chayka didn't even mention reddit or lemmy and only barely mentioned Mastodon

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Internet has never been as large and diverse as it is now. In the 2000s Wikipedia was often the only place where you could find generally useful information about the world on the Internet, now everything in it plus many other things can be found on many other websites competing for algorithmic attention.

The real thing about today's Internet is that on it, censorship happens not by having too little information, but too much, much of which will never be shown to very many people because of the algorithms of search engines or social media recommendation systems. I don't do a lot of "social media" and always find it weird to hear about personalities there who apparently have thousands or millions of followers but whom I have never heard of before.

[–] nix@midwest.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree that Wikipedia used to be the only place. There were plenty of competing encyclopedias, it was simply the best long-term.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

britannica has entered the chat

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It’s interesting to see the author mention BlueSky, I think as a potential positive, alongside Mastodon and other federated protocols. Here in the Fediverse I only ever see negative views of it, largely because it doesn’t use Activity Pub but also because it’s coming from a private company. But it sounds like the author thinks we need that diversity?