this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Greentext

4452 readers
1407 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It astounds me that people can be this fed up and somehow not become radical socialists, at least fucking unionize god damn

like there's a whole book written specifically about why this would happen and how workers can fight back

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Slaps Bible, you just need to pray more, at our mega church sponsored by VerizonAmazonPal

[–] VonCesaw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's extremely easy to mislead people who their enemy is when there is one group that has multiplicative magnitudes of wealth over the other

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Radical socialist aka lazy bones capitalists

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be honest, the older I get the more I realize the value to being lazy.

And for the record, the vast majority of people are fucking lazy. All life forms are, they don't really don't want to do work. We weren't put on this earth to work to live.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Animals spend a lot of time doing nothing. Not sleeping, just sitting around:

Contrary to the perceptions of nature as a well-oiled machine, we see inactivity in all corners of the animal kingdom. In fact, it seems that many creatures spend the majority of their time inactive, which is defined as time that an individual is awake but not engaging in any specific task or activity. Observations of animals have shown that some creatures spend between 75% (lions) to 85% (hummingbirds) of their time being at rest. That’s a lot of time doing nothing!

There's also estimates that hunter-gatherers only work 15-20 hours per week.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WFH solves at least three of those problems, but only if our corporate lords allow it.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my experience WFH wasn't worth it. The jobs pay way less with shitty benefits and the pressure was intense. Hybrid jobs are much more chill and pay more so I can afford things like a weekly cleaning lady to take some pressure off home life.

It shouldn't be like this but here we are, and we have to make the best of it.

[–] RagingNerdoholic@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None of that is inherent to WFH, that's just your employers being assholes.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

And quite likely intentional to make workers think WFH is inherently bad