this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
81 points (97.6% liked)

Games

16800 readers
521 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It urged the board to consider taking the company private, “implement a comprehensive cost reduction program and optimize staffing levels to be more comparable with industry leaders”

Standard investor BS. He's just calling for layoffs friends, fuck that guy.

What they need to do is just gut the entire executive team. Not just the CEO but everyone. They clearly have no idea how to run a gaming company.

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

" optimize staffing levels to be more comparable with industry leaders”

I will never understand why investor types like to play follow the leader rather than giving strategic or financial reasons for business decisions. Who gives a shit if every other studio is laying people off? If the staffing is right for your company then following other industry leaders will only make things worse and cement you in a place behind those leaders.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 6 points 2 months ago

Because investors are. Less people=more money for them. This minority investor just wants to get their money and run. Layoff more people, temporary bump, sell off, and get out. Sorry mate, you bet on Ubisoft, every gamer knows that it was only a matter of time until people realized how shitty they were being.

I'm glad the crew and the general blandness of all of their games has finally caught up with them

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's almost as if being publicly traded is bad for the stability and longevity of a company. Who would have thought?

[Disclaimer: I only read the headline]

[–] borth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

... "bad for the stability and longevity" of the shareholders. If a publicly traded company tried anything other than "line go up", it might still be stable and long lasting.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

Just another example of how broken the premium end of the gaming industry is. Ubisoft is an old fashioned publisher, trying to churn out big hit AAA games based on big IP but producing poor quality buggy games, which don't turn a profit.

We keep hearing how the games industry is "in trouble" but its actually thriving with loads of smaller devs and publishers doing well. The problem is the behemoth publishers like Ubisoft who release games based on financials timelines rather than the games being finished or high quality.

Its not like Ubisoft are short of good IP. What they're lacking is good quality control and an environment to foster high quality creativity. When you treat gaming like its just a production line to generate money this is what you get. Making AAA games is expensive for sure, but its pointless if you don't get the quality and the creativity right too - they're just making expensice games.

We're seeing the same in the movie industry - big studios producing franchise movies on a financially driven schedule with poor quality and lack of creativity.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

Its almost like you have to make games that people want to buy and play in order to stay in business.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Every game they've released in the past 5+ years has been mid or worse. They're too big of a company to keep releasing mediocre games. Not only that but every game they've been coming out with has been hyped with stupid bullshit like NFTs and AAAA quality games. They're trying to survive on gimmicks while betting on all the wrong things.

They're just gonna lay off a bunch of people, make another assassin's creed game, and then call it a day.

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ubisoft has been listening to their investors instead of their consumer.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 7 points 2 months ago

Isn't that what Ford said?

It comes in any color you like, as long as it's investor approved and will maximize their yield.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago
[–] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

The company will be dead by 2026 if they don't get free money from the Canadian Government and Mr. Fink.