It should be safe, using fstab is how I do a network mount to a specific folder also so it doesn't change or anything.
BakedCatboy
joined 11 months ago
Edit: of course the below only applies to chrome and possibly chrome derivatives - FF is keeping MV2
It'll make it a lot more likely that YouTube ads will get through because MV3 limits the block list size to a fraction of the size normally used by uBO and also disallows external/live updates to the block list, instead forcing the rules to be baked into the extension. Meaning an update to the blocking rules could take a week of extension review time to go through. I heard that the YouTube ad blocking rules can update multiple times a day so this would easily allow Google to update their ad code before approving updates to ad blockers, allowing them to always stay ahead.
So it might not outright break it, but some rules will have to be left off so it seems like it'll be a dice roll if you get an ad where the blocking rule had to be left off to fit Google's block list limit or the rule you have is stale because it took a couple weeks for the extension update to be approved on the extension store.
The feature of MV3 that enables these changes is that in MV3, the extension is handing over the complete blocklist to chrome, which does the blocking and gets to put limits on the blocklist. In MV2, the extension is given a direct hook to do the blocking itself, so it can have an unlimited block list size and can source the blocklist from anywhere. Think of it kind of like the difference between letting a graduation speaker speak off the cuff vs the school reviewing the speech beforehand and having their finger on the mic switch in case you wander off script. So the new system technically can be more secure and performant because the blocklist is reviewed as part of the extension and because poorly written blocker code can't slow you down (only Google's optimized logic is allowed to run) but it only works if they don't impose limits lower than what effective ad blockers need (ie updating frequently like daily and allowing a large blocklist). Plus uBo is written really well for resource usage so it's getting crippled even though it's a shining example of an effective ad blocker.
Plus there are even more limitations like certain types of advanced rules that all I understand is just needed for certain sites that are tricky., but those rules aren't supported in MV3. The uBo GitHub wiki has some information about this: https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#filtering-capabilities-which-cant-be-ported-to-mv3
I like using bitwarden, the selfhosted vaultwarden server stores it with passwords and makes codes available in the app / browser extension. I also keep them backed up on a nas and synced off-site just in case.
The screenshot doesn't show any version change to signal - the version number is the same, so I was just answering why you might see an update like that since I thought that was part of your question.
Those might be flatpak "refreshes", which show up as "updating to the same version". As described by a flatpak maintainer, sometimes an app or runtime gets updated without changing the user-facing version number. I assume that's what you're seeing here.
I'm gonna go with unlikely.
Huh, I already signed up for it because they started requiring it a while back to access historical tax return documents through the IRS website.
I just discovered how easy ollama and open webui are to set up so I've been using llama3 locally too, it was like 20 lines in docker compose, and although I've been using gpt3.5 on and off for a long time I'm much more comfortable using models run locally so I've been playing with it a lot more. It's also cool being able to easily switch models at any point during a conversation. I have like 15 models downloaded, mostly 7b and a few 13b models and they all run fast enough on CPU and generate slightly slower than reading speed and only take ~15-30 seconds to start spitting out a response.
Next I want to set up a vscode plugin so I can use my own locally run codegen models from within vscode.
Apparently it's not very hard to negate the system prompt...
Did you make sure to stop network manager too? I think disabling it tells it not to start it automatically but I think if it was already running it may have stayed up and maybe it brought the interface back up.
That's my only guess, if ip link shows it as down still then idk. NetworkManager also has its own Mac spoofing thing so you might have better success editing the properties of the network connection in NetworkManager and putting a new Mac in the cloned Mac address field. I've only used macchanger with netctl.
This is one of the reasons I never want a car with it's own internet connection. I'll stick to plugging in my phone, where I'm very stingy with which apps even get location data, much less the "physical activity history" permission which allows this kind of continuous tracking (and which is usually needed because it uses Google's algorithms / possibly neural nets to guess whether you're driving or walking based on accelerometer / gyro / gps / magnetometer sensor fusion).
Also add DISM to that - if it's corrupted it could cause you to be unable to install windows updates.
It's also possible that fixing it may require the original windows installation media matching your windows version build number - which means if you've since installed a major windows update there may not be an available installation iso that meets the requirement. Happened to me and I was lucky enough to coax an iso out of the windows installer download page that satisfied the repair tool (oddly enough downloading an iso using the Windows Media creation tool didn't work, but spoofing Linux on the page to directly download an iso gave me a different iso that worked)
These are the things I do to maintain my last windows machine.