DScratch

joined 1 year ago
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not to mention the self image impact such things would have on women with smaller breasts, who (as I understand it) generally already struggle with poor self image due to breast size.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait, so I can just damage other people’s property?!

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 36 points 5 days ago

Could I interest you in some diagonal bracing today?

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can only imagine the level of sealclubbing that’s about to begin.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

That’s right!

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I’m enjoying it, have maybe 2 hours played so far. Seems worth the price of admission.

Will probably use it as a palette cleanser between games of Deadlock.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

OP being green text author, not the Lemmy OP.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don’t be obtuse. OP openly admitted to wearing clothes and behaving in a way that makes them more threatening to vulnerable women.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

You’re posting in sh.itjust.works, hoser.

Now drink that Molson, there’s a Leafs game in 8 hours and I’m not paying $12 for a half a beer, eh?

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What jurisdiction are we talking?
For Canada, I think there's a good argument for 2.d.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-264.html

engaging in threatening conduct directed at the other person or any member of their family.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (16 children)

And, illegal if you can make the argument that OP knew or should have known their behavior would be unwelcome.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Will you please invest my money for me?

view more: next ›