Dave

joined 1 year ago
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Doesn't that say they default new users to a server owned by them? That's the same kind of thing as defaulting to Lemmy.world for Lemmy apps.

What I mean is a larger list of trusted instances. Including ones outside the control of one organisation, though I get that this is risky for Mastodon because they don't want to default people to somewhere that's going to shut down or have some drama and ruin a hard earned brand.

We probably have more leeway to do it in Lemmy apps since (with the exception of Jerboa) they aren't developed by "Lemmy", and Lemmy.world is also not run by "Lemmy". But for this same reason, " Lemmy" has no control over what these apps default to.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

When a user (say, my mother) gets to a page that says pick a server, she would immediately close the page and go do something else. How do you even begin to choose a server? What if you get it wrong? What should you consider when picking a server?

Its a simple concept that can be explained in a minute. But if you don't have someone sitting next to you that understands it and can explain it, that user is gone.

Registration applications are an unrelated barrier but a barrier none the less. You don't have to apply to Facebook and wait to be approved. People expect to just be able to sign up and immediately go.

For anyone familiar with the fediverse both of these things seem like non-issues. But for your average Facebook user. Hell, even your average reddit user, they will take one look at either a page telling them to pick a server or a page telling them they have to apply and wait, and unless they are familiar with the Fediverse already then they will back away slowly (or quickly).

When my instance turned on registration applications, there was a 10x drop in the number of registrations, and I've heard similar numbers from others.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (14 children)

I think it would definitely be nice to spread users (and communities) across more instances. Doubly so since I'm on an instance that is struggling with the volume of content from Lemmy.world because of what is effectively a limit of how much you can get from one instance at a time.

But if we want people on Lemmy who don't know what Linux is, then we need to avoid that massive barrier of asking users to pick an instance. And the second massive barrier of registration applications.

A good compromise I think would be to have multiple trusted servers with open registrations that the app randomly defaults them to when they go to sign up for an account.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

Oh nice! I also saw the other one showing almost half of the followers of those accounts are on mastodon.social.

I guess Lemmy finds it a little harder to get communities set up away from the big instances because to get a community off the ground you need eyeballs, and the biggest instances have the most eyeballs in the All feed.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm curious what this looks like for Mastodon. Of the top X accounts listed by followers, what proportion are on instances run by the Mastodon organisation?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (22 children)

Everyone goes to Lemmy.world because unlike most instances it has (effectively) open registration and some popular Lemmy apps use it in their signup flow so new users don't have to understand the intricacies of the fediverse they can just hop straight in.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 27 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don't get what you want for Lemmy. Lemmy has 50k active monthly users. The forums I used to frequent 20 years ago had a fraction of that.

How many people are you expecting for your online forum?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haha could have called it "where do people live?"

Reminds me of this xkcd (the US map even looks the same as the OP)

xkcd of population map pet peeve

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

I'm too worried to play this. Is it gonna feel like they made more levels for World of Goo or is it gonna redefine casual gaming?

Someone want to do the work?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Yah, I see your battery density graph and the batteries in question would blow a hole in that chart, and several charts above it.

I'm not sure if we are looking at the same chart. The chart goes up to 500 Wh/kg, the same as this new Samsung battery as per the original article. It's may well be the same battery that gives the chart that value, but notice the years prior it gets higher and higher up to that value.

It might be 10 years away from being the mainstream battery but the battery technology that was 10 years away 9 years ago is almost here.

What makes you think that’s “sudden”?

I was meaning how EVs created a consumer market for huge batteries where prior to that the biggest battery in your house might have been a power tool. But you're right, there was a premium market for emerging battery tech and it increases along a scale like anything else.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 49 points 3 months ago (4 children)

You're assuming that Arch causes the unhappiness. Maybe unhappy people naturally tend to use Arch, so as to avoid further pain from painful distros like Pop! OS?.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 58 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

Nah, see the battery density graph here. Batteries have made great progress already, and it's accelerating because suddenly there are trillions of dollars on the line for anyone that can make big strides in battery technology.

view more: ‹ prev next ›