Gsus4

joined 1 year ago
[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's potentially worse, because before you may have had an algorithm that a human could fine tune or whistleblow on. Now if it is trained on large datasets, the resulting algorithm is usually a blackbox weight matrix, they probably have no idea what pattern it is optimizing :S

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Quand le gauchisme est trop elitiste et maginalise les zones rurales, je crois que ça aliene des blocs essentiels du pays et les pousse dans les bras des reaccionaires.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

C'est facile: ceux qui ont l'air d'être mangemorts sont de droite :) (dans l'image, ceux qui votent, c'est plus dificile)

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Je pensait que c'etait le NFP cette fois-ci 😅, mais ils savent tout mieux que quiconque.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Problem is this is a Cell vs C18 fight. Don't let Cell win and absorb C18 :/ neither can win.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I get that you don't need to be a professional instrument player to make good music...or be a professional composer...but if everything that takes effort, knowledge, experience and practice is done for you, what are you really contributing? Curation, maybe?

This is great for people who make indie games to focus on gameplay and structure. You can make a full soundtrack and background images in a 2 minutes for free. But you can't say it is going to help foster the creativity that great composers valued, because you will eventually see e.g. music at the top level, as styles you can remix with some characteristics, but won't be aware of how they are built and can be rebuilt to create something truly new.

This will limit creativity, because we will associate novelty with a high-level remix/fusion in a preset number of dimensions instead of the much higher possibilities coming from complexity underneath.

...it's like I'm talking about low-level programming languages vs high-level ones :)

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The self-repairable part is odd to me.You need to keep feeding, oxygenating it and to prevent infections, otherwise it will rot :S Besides, on humans the healing relies on blood for platelets and crusts to form and a whole immune system...it needs too much babysitting to be called "self-healing".

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think it's pretty clear they want to own it, not ban it.

First, they will use the rights of artists to gather popular and lawmaker support in their war against AI-content, then big labels will integrate it to turn around and screw creators over. It's a classic.

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 4 points 5 months ago

synthetic playmates..got it 👯

[–] Gsus4@programming.dev 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I was surprised it took them this long. But this just means that labels want to own AI songmaking, this is not good for creators or listeners either. Rick Beato was talking about this today:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1bZ0OSEViyo&pp=ygUKcmljayBiZWF0bw%3D%3D (minute 6)

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/umg-startsai-voice-clone-partnership-with-soundlabs-1235041808/

view more: ‹ prev next ›