Hackerman_uwu

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

I consult in some companies that don’t even allow copy/paste in outlook. Like, these are actually MS security policies that can be set.

How in all of the actual fucks could they allow MS to see everything on your screen.

I agree with your non starter assessment.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The rework is titled: ‘Enter sockman’.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Sure. I definitely do not disagree about the price but I wish you’d made it about that and not the art. Have a good Friday!

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Perhaps more likely years of work with colour and colour theory preceding a quick output of some content? Why the sarcastic tone?

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Could be, the man was a fucking genius hi created some of my personal favourite paintings.

Was that your point?

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is a measure of exactly nothing.

https://www.nme.com/photos/30-minutes-or-less-19-famous-songs-written-at-staggering-speed-1422651

Your post makes it very clear that you have little experience in the creative world. There is no linear measure of successs or quality. You do a great disservice to those toiling with their creativity by making comments such as this one. We need artists, they are fragile things and should be treated with care.

I didn’t start this post planning to get hetup but I do feel that taking umbrage to your comment is fair, if not tautological.

I would encourage you to labour over a still life or wrestle a passable rendition of your favourite guitar riff. Try sing the first phrase of your favourite song in key. Trust me: none of those things are easy.

If you don’t like “Orange” then just look at something else and hold your tongue.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Also in the industry and I gotta say it’s not often I agree with every damn point. You nailed it. Thanks for posting!

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Two body problem.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (9 children)

Is this real though? Does ChatGPT just literally take whole snippets of texts like that? I thought it used some aggregate or probability based on the whole corpus of text it was trained on.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Whentember juneteenth

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When you paste that code you do it in your private IDE, in a dev environment and you test it thoroughly before handing it off to the next person to test before it goes to production.

Hitting up ChatPPT for the answer to a question that you then vomit out in a meeting as if it’s knowledge is totally different.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Agreed. Reddit now has ai generated echo chambers.

 

So after a run in with a moderator yesterday I’ve had some thoughts I felt I wanted to share.

I won’t name them here, you are welcome to look at my comment history and make up your own mind.

In this instance a user posted some misinformation. I don’t think they intended to, they merely perpetuated a myth, they clearly simply knew no better.

I tried to respond diplomatically, they doubled down, other users piled on, the downvotes are plenty and then I responded with an article citing evidence supporting my assertions.

I also stated that the burden of proof lies with the claimant and asked for some context on why they seemed dead set on the lie they were aping back, asking if they subscribe to other myth based beliefs, religions, etc. That post was unceremoniously deleted with no notice to me and no reasons given… until the user pointed out in another post that they are the sole mod of the community and warned me that they were “not afraid to ban” me should I “cross the line” in a very *‘I’m the sheriff of this here town’ *tone. Which gave me a chuckle.

That’s my side of the story, it’s all there if you want to draw your own conclusions. It really doesn’t matter who is right or wrong in a ‘someone is wrong on the internet’ spat but I did spot a chink in the fediverse through this incident.

The real point here is that this kind of behaviour is one of things that made Reddit fucking awful and I’d hate to see it flourish here in the fediverse.

I don’t have the solutions just some suggestions that I’d be keen to hear others opinions on:

  1. No moderation without representation. IOW: mods should be democratically elected.
  2. Mod elections should be annual and no mod should enjoy that status for life.
  3. There should be a mechanism for inducing a ‘no confidence’ mode election at any time otherwise the communities are likely to splinter into “real_” communities just as they did on Reddit which no community in the fediverse can currently afford.

What say you my brothers and sisters and everything in between? Is there a way to safeguard against cronyism, corruption and other frailties of the human ego?

view more: next ›