HobbitFoot

joined 1 year ago
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the ad monopoly is subsidizing the other businesses.

Breaking up Google to smaller companies but leaving the ad market as is the same just creates more Mozillas, companies technically independent but still relying on the same revenue stream.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 1 month ago (12 children)

But how do you break up Google? Their ad business is the lynchpin to their monopolies and breaking off chunks without being able to self fund is just asking for harm to the market.

Breaking off Chrome while banning paid default search status puts the browser company with the same problem as Firefox.

No one can run a search company without ads.

Cutting along business lines is just going to create smaller monopolies or dead product lines.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

the tech space is very much innovate or die

Is it still? The VC funding has started drying up and every tech company has started worrying about profitability now. I think the old innovate or die mantra has played itself out.

And IBM & Motorola diminished in part because they stuck to older industries where cost became as important as innovation and didn't lower their cost.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

You also have some newer mods who are controlling the narrative for profit.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago

I'm not putting any work stuff on by home computer. I'm not giving work admin rights to that.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why? Amazon seems to have built an amazing system with AWS, but does it need the same amount of staff time to maintain it that it needed to develop it?

If Amazon acknowledges that it isn't going to be developing new products to the scale it did for the past decade, it probably doesn't need the headcount it had before.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 month ago

There is already a lot of work in generative game design that doesn't involve AI, including a lot of procedurally generated items. There is also a lot of bad generated designs as the inputs allowed to be changed are not sufficient enough to create enough variance.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago

Or you had several companies try to start their own streaming services from scratch and thought you needed a ton of new shows to fill it. Disney+ could have easily gotten away with archived Disney Channel shows, all the animated Disney cartoons, the old Star Wars & Marvel movies, and the Simpsons. It didn't need a lot of the new shows, no matter how cool they looked.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 2 months ago

If graphics were with it, people would pay for it.

The fact of the matter is that exponential graphics capabilities requires an exponential input of developer and asset creator budget. Given that there is a ceiling on game prices, it isn't worth it going for higher fidelity games when the market isn't going to pay for it.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unscripted content? So religious reality TV? Good, that sounds worse.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 33 points 3 months ago

I don't see the benefits but I see drama this would cause.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 3 months ago

Banning cell phones for soldiers on the front line has become common since the phone transmissions are used as bombing targets.

However, the blackout of YouTube for the civilian populace is mainly for control purposes, especially as Ukraine is fairly active on YouTube.

view more: ‹ prev next ›