IllNess

joined 1 year ago
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is piped or invidious working for you?

The popular servers are down. Google put some kind of limit on them. I'm going to guess bandwidth limit.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

Yes. I think a huge issue is Linux doesn't handle other app activities like how Android's Intent or Broadcast does.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 22 points 2 months ago

When I say Linux phones, I mean selling a phone with Linux already or Linux ready, not taking existing phones with Android and putting Linux on them.

Examples:
Purism Librem 5
PinePhone Pro
Pro1 X
Volla Phone X23

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My guess is that we need something more appealing like the Steam Deck to make people take the step.

Hear me out! The Steam Phone®!

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 67 points 2 months ago (20 children)

There are Linux phones available. I,m going to guess popularity of those devices to increase soon.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 20 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Most professional programmers, graphic artist, and designers I met use MacOS.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it was a simple flag, you would be correct a computer will react faster than any human but when you factor in everything else like constantly analysis of surroundings, decision making, and accounting for physical limitations, then yes. It's the reason why Waymo cars move so slowly.

If a person was standing at a sidewalk, hidden behind an object, far away from a pedestrian way or traffic signal and jumps 2 feet in front of a car going 25 mph, the average driver with their full faculties would do better than Waymo.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The reports of the safety of AVs is overstated when you consider that they are limited within a city limit, they rarely go on the highway, they follow speed limits in cities which is lower than highways, people are more aware of AVs, and during their trial runs they had an actual human in the car to correct them.

On average, AVs are safer especially when you consider some bad drivers do not get better, people drink, people get sleepy, people distract themselves. and young drivers lack experience. But the average driver with it with their full faculties would do better in tests based solely on reactions.

if you look at the accident reports and took out drivers who were on a substance, are younger than 25 or older than 70, was distracted with something like their phones or others in the car, were not following laws, and those who were emotional then the stats would be pretty close.

Overall I do believe AVs are better for world because peak performance of an average driver is rare.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Human vision also have the brain that does a lot of automation like figuring out distance and looking out for danger with real time reaction speed. Night vision is usually better for most people too. The brain also combines that with sound so it can detect things out of vision. Eyes already have a range of view but the human head can also move around accurately. On top of all this focus is what the human brain is best at. While cameras can see 360°, years of data built in the subconscious taught a human driver what to look out for.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 5 points 2 months ago

This correct. Waymo cars have both radar and Lidar plus like 29 cameras.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago

Either pcrdist.com is being DDOSed or being hugged to death.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago

Better than i thought. Thank you for sharing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›