Starlink is definitely at a loss right now. Despite this, Falcon 9 launch costs are significantly lower for actual customers as well, and the reuse factor cannot be ignored
Player2
That's a tablet with a keyboard case
All I'm hearing is potential savings $$$
Haven't been on there since the event, though I do read some threads if they come up in a search. Not intending on returning, though I haven't gotten rid of my old account yet
They try to block requests for copyrighted content and for real people
Right now they're actually doing more launches with less money and waste, but hate on I guess
For c to c cables, the devices need to be able to communicate with each other to establish which one is the host (the charger in this case). With a to c cables, the type a side is assumed to be the host by default. You'll often find that manufacturers of cheaper devices prefer not to spend the extra money to implement this technology, though some will, and in fact allow for even more functionality. For example, one of my flashlights does have that chip, so it can both charge from a c to c cable if a charger is detected, and also automatically act as a power bank if I connect a device to it such as a mobile phone.
It's not difficult to find though it can be expensive. I've been using Anker multi port type c chargers for years
But how else could companies make more money off of something you already paid for? Will someone think of the shareholders‽
Yeah that's the point, that the OP might not be intelligent enough to know that it's a high school instead of university
Grayjay is also an option
"I am a big dumb dumb idiot" - rtxn@lemmy.world
Don't worry it's not an attack on you or a lie about what you said, just sarcasm.