Getting a UTI speed run, any %.
Szyler
You need to vote for people that will PUT guillotines on the ballot! If there are none, find someone who will, or be the change you want to see.
You can't do that with personal information like the ones doctors needs transcribed. It has to be local.
Do electrical engineer with renewable or environmental focus and you'll have a more even ratio.
I instinctively closed your comment after reading "short attention span" because I knew what you were going to say. Had to go back to comment because I realise the irony.
What about staying at 0? Why is debt better than no debt AND no surplus?
What's stopping someone from creating a new one. The devs? "Please select a username for your account" when creating your first character. After that you cannot change it, and is linked to all your characters. If you get reported, the report would include the account name = unique "John1836q83" getting banned.
This enforces band the same way as PSN linked email would do, but is all ingame and accessible to 100% of players that own the game.
If it is a simple popup that has 0 implications and is only visible when reporting, no one would care, and definitely not enough to boycott the entire game.
They obviously want to force psn account for other reasons.
I don't even own the game. Im just saying, if their argument is unique identifiers, there are more ways than a third party solution. It's not like they don't have options. They chose this over any other solution. If they did a unique identifier ingame, no one would complain. So the reason they chose this is something else then being the only solution.
Why can't they make a unique username when you create a character the first time that is just your "account name"? That would give you the samw powers as a psn username when it comes to banning. Edit:spelling
While I don't want to support weapons, blaming people that bought the vr headset in the past for what he would do with the money after the sale is a very bad take. You can't blame them for not knowing the future.
Also the argument itself doesn't make much sense and can be strawmaned to "you pay taxes, therefore you are a complicit in the murders of your military, therefore you are a bad person".
No, because there are error bars on "things", and "everyone", and "knows", and on "by the time they are 30".
This means that statistically, following a Bell curve on where people land based on this, there will be some that will be much older, and much younger that have heard of a specific thing to the point of "knowing" it.
It's not impossible to counter this while still having text be correct if you use a dialogue model that takes parameters to ue in calculation of the output dialogue.
"Dialogue here should lead you to the {direction}."
NPC cords, quest objective cords = calculate relative position, insert in dialogue.
The game knows after you take the quest. So it can also know at the moment.