chicken

joined 1 year ago
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I guess that's somewhat true if you are sharing an implementation around, but even avoiding the feature being widely known could make a difference. Even if it was known, I think the scoring could work alright on its own. A malicious removal could be quickly reversed manually and all reporters scores zeroed.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (9 children)

I had an idea for a system sort of like this to reduce moderator burden. The idea would be for each user to have a score based on their volume and ratio of correct reports to incorrect reports (determined by whether it ultimately resulted in a moderator action) of rule breaking comments/posts. Content is automatically removed if the cumulative scores of people who have reported it is high enough. Moderators can manually adjust the scores of users if needed, and undo community mod actions. More complex rules could be applied as needed for how scores are determined.

To address the possibility that such a system would be abused, I think the best solution would be secrecy. Just don't let anyone know that this is how it works, or that there is a score attached to their account that could be gamed. Pretend it's a new kind of automod or AI bot or something, and have a short time delay between the report that pushes it over the edge and the actual removal.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 months ago

The most toxic multiplayer interactions are always from your own team

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I think I read that the noise reduction from a suppressor is actually pretty minimal, and it's still in the same "incredibly painfully loud" ballpark as a regular gunshot

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

I meant the one about gatekeeping sex on bookreading but that could work too

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sounds like she wanted it but was committed to taking the advice of that John Waters quote

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Does this mean if you took someone's ashes and spread them over a farm, it would then be illegal to eat the crops that grow from it?

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

If you set up qbittorrent with the built-in search you can torrent stuff without ever opening your browser

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

OP has preempted your comment by specifying "TOS-breaking" tho

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

cute character

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The chicken uprising will happen, only a matter of time

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If enough people pirate, there will be popular support for reforming copyright, so eventually there's less crackdown

view more: ‹ prev next ›