lightsblinken

joined 4 months ago
[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

its the point where people say "but a sneaky vpn will get around so we may as well do nothing" is equivalent to "my friend can buy me a sneaky drink so we may as well do nothing"... just because you can exploit a law doesn't make it invalid. enforcement concerns are valid, but it seems reasonable to start with "i agree there is a problem" and go for the 80% rule

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

technology related muscle memory? once people learn a thing, its hard to convince them to relearn something new ... especially when you "are just doing the same thing anyway".

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

nope nope nope.

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

i hear you, though being more open with hardware is more difficult because compat issues are real. the company does appear to be doing alright tho?

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

good commentary, covered a lot of ground - appreciate the effort to write it up :)

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

you need cm level accuracy?

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

does anyone actually want that? seems beyond the original use case

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

this is exactly the question that needs answering... the PIR is bullshit