lud

Are jellyfin apps available on most devices yet?

Isn't the BSD licence more open though?

Your comment is bizarre. I wouldn't ban anyone over it. But if you had spammed that multiple times as alleged in the ban, fair enough.

For the record I have also been banned for stupid reasons on .ml

For example when this power hungry mod said some bullshit and got downvoted to hell for it, I commented and got a lot of upvotes. So as is customary in .ml they censored my comment because they disagree because I was "rationalising fascism" which is completely ridiculous.

Obviously I called them out and called them a fascist, because I know you guys think that's the absolute worst insult ever (which is unfortunately diminished by the fact that you use it for literally everything). It's honestly quite insane how tankies honestly seems to believe everything Putin says.

People are actively censoring and denying any responsibility from the Democrats regarding the genocide in Gaza.

Any examples on Lemmy?

That's because people are stupid enough to never write down their keys and it's better to have somewhat worse encryption compared to no encryption.

In an enterprise the recovery keys are most often stored in AD or Entra.

That's a shame. Well at least it is not as important since you don't actually live there. Not saying it's not important, it's not just quite as important as someone actually living there.

If one system is somehow compromised, the attacker could effectively impersonate all the systems on your entire domain if they had the wildcard cert. Maybe it's not a huge deal for individuals but for companies or other organisations it could be extremely dangerous.

If someone wanted a wildcard cert at work I would be very cautious before I even considered issuing one. Unfortunately there are a few wildcard certs on our domain, but those are from before my time.

Luckily, wildcard certs are insecure and should be avoided.

I have already addressed that in my original comment.

Go to a store.

Just because you wanted to inspect people's creations in a way that suites you better doesn't make banning piracy fundamentally immoral.

the discussion ends here.

Sounds great. It's honestly no use arguing with idiots.

“I really don’t understand why people think they have a moral right to other people’s creations.”

That's a straw man fallacy. That statement removes all the always important context you just alluded to, a statement which was never claimed.

In the articles this is being claimed:

Free dissemination of knowledge that benefits the advancement of mankind should never be illegal. In fact, Z-Library being illegal is immoral.

You say that it's immoral that Z-Library is illegal. The purpose of Z-Library is arguably to provide people with copyrighted content for free. I.E Other people's creations.

Please tell me what important context I'm missing. To me it honestly just seems like you want someone else's stuff for free and are just brining up morally in a misguided way to achieve that. Wanting free shit is great, I support that. Pirate all you want. But it isn't about morality.

P.S. isn't bringing up the straw man fallacy a straw man fallacy itself? Some people have started to say that every argument they disagree with is essentially a straw man fallacy.

That's true but in the context it puts a very bad taste in my mouth.

I really don't understand why people think they have a moral right to other people's creations.