nondescripthandle

joined 8 months ago

Literally what Ill do if this happens. One account that gets no notifications posts no content and votes, then another account where I comment.

Witch hunting mostly. Big 'we caught the Boston Bomber reddit' moment.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Guarentee you will start witch hunts by making the votes more accessible. But if you want every user to be able to do that then go ahead. My ability to keep myself occupied here is already not that large, maybe some witch hunts are what we need to drive engagement up /s

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The largesr draw about a social media is who's on it. I can't tell you how many invites to things I miss for not being on social media. Anyone outside of my immediate friend group simply makes plans on Facebook and goes through their friends list to invite people and wont remember some one they maybe see every other month especially among the dozens of names they already looked through to invite. Some peopel are fine sacrificing social life for some small protest that has no effect on Facebook's MAUs and profit, and other's would rather not isolate for a fight they can't win.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean that's why you're here too. Lemmy would be all I needed if all I cared about was Linux and Star Trek memes. But lets say I want a live thread with hundreds of people all watching the same sporting event I am and chatting about it, I'm going to need to go somewhere else.

FTC, theres a company here that got so big it thinks its internet video app terms absolve it's completely seperate theme park from being sued. If that's not too big to exist then nothing is.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"We carefully selected a group of outside 'yes-men' to test our product on so we don't have to change anything and investors will love the results we show them but now we don't understand why real people don't like it"

Yeah it's more like a side effect of hate drugs.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh I'm far to pragmatic to believe that. If truth isn't working, then what choice do you really have?

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I read the article because I was quite sure China already had internet identifiers. This article is just about China wanting to make the government the sole proprieter of internet identities. Propaganda line or not that does make the privacy line make sense as less organizations are tracking your identifiers, and it's not as if the CPC wouldn't have the access to information the non government companies have. My sense is you're not really hiding from them simply by using private companies whenever you can. It's a tighter grip for sure, but it's not going to change much on its own.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So this is different from Korean iPIN because Chinese people can only get it from the government in the new proposal? It looks like they both already tie online presence to traceable identifiers, just Korea allows you to get it from government or private company and China wants to take that ability away from private companies.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is it wrong to root this on simply because I hate that shitbag?

view more: ‹ prev next ›