richieadler

joined 1 year ago
[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

There's a period. It reads "in all other matters, government fuck off".

Which is consistent with the poster declaring their anarchism.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 30 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Uphold the values of the constitution of the USA, but in the digital space.

And fuck the rest of the world?

And otherwise fuck off, govt

Anarchist nonsense. Zero government = total chaos. The strong eats the weak. Like now, but worse.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Cue the Max Headroom episode where the blanks (disconnected people) are chased by the censors because the blanks steal cable so their children can watch the educational shows and learn to read, and they are forced to use clandestine printing presses to teach them.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

My hand position moves all over the place as I type

Clearly not a touch typist, then. The hands goes over the F and J (that's why the bumps are there on the keys, after all) and the fingers extend or fold to reach out to the other keys, but never move. And to use Shift with a key you use the one that's on the other hand than the one pressing the key. However, that's the formal version for typewriters, where you don't have extended sequence pressed with a change key. For long sequences of Ctrl+key, I tend to do as you do and use always the same Ctrl to press them all. However, individual Ctrl+key presses may benefit of the Right Ctrl key.

Multiple layouts for my native creates the need to engage in "mental modes" where your muscle memory tries to adapt to the layout you remember. I tend to configure the keyboard for the layout I use more frequently, even if it differs from the one printed in the keyboard. That makes for some confusing times for the rarer keys, though :)

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And those who abhor weapons can still die upon them.

Did thinking of that image feel good for you?

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one -4 points 10 months ago

I thought you were the one saying IA thinks, it was someone else. Apologies for that.

OTOH you can take your sarcasm and insert it rectally.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I object to your characterization that current AI "thinks". It does nothing of the sort.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago

Standing ovation

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 10 months ago

A former co-worker messaged me via LinkedIn to tell me about a job (that I got). But other than that... No use.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Forget about the possibility that we may finally have developed machines that think, that comprehend the world in a way similar to how humans do and can communicate with us on our level.

That isn't what's happening with "IA" right now.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

People using it, however, won't.

[–] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

So? Does that undo the work you accomplished and submitted?

If it's creative work and other people create a whole saga of AI-generated crap with my ideas while I don't see a dime... I've lost.

And all the "successful" scenarios you've shown look more like cons and the recipe for shoddy work, so no, I'm not sold.

By the way, weapons are tech also, and I'm also opposed to their use.

view more: ‹ prev next ›