sab

joined 1 year ago
[–] sab@kbin.social 26 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Also Telegram is growing shadier day by day. Signal is the way to go.

[–] sab@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Is Linux Mint well adapted for touch screens?

I think I would go for GNOME if I were to use Linux with a touch screen. Then again, I'm using it anyway, so I'm probably biased.

[–] sab@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Clearly Mike needs to stop being absurd.

[–] sab@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

Indeed, thanks!

[–] sab@kbin.social 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm sure you're aware of it already, but WineHQ provides a good overview over which software runs well under WINE. :)

[–] sab@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

You go to @potus and follow him from there. :)

[–] sab@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What a sad faith for a website named after the glorious Dodo.

[–] sab@kbin.social 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

But Twitter used to have a monopoly, and it doesn't any more.

I can now follow an official white house account directly from Kbin, whereas yesterday i would have had to sign up for either Twitter or Threads. That makes a difference. :)

[–] sab@kbin.social 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's @potus, for those on platforms that can view microblogs and that are not defederated from Threads.

Remember that comments are not federated to/from threads yet. If I understood correctly, likes are federated.

[–] sab@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Then again, why would a fan page want to open for contributions from outside of that fan page? Why would the Star Wars wiki federate edits with the Startrek wiki? On which page of the wiki would this make sense?

I just don't get it.

[–] sab@kbin.social 105 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (11 children)

I'm not sure I see the benefit of this. The point that Wikipedia might eventually become corrupted is made moot by the permissive licensing of the information there. The main challenge of the Wiki format is with fact checking and ensuring quality, which is only made more complicated by having a federated platform.

ActivityPub is great for creating the social web. The added benefit of ActivityPub for non-social services is not obvious to me at all.

That said, it's a cool proof of concept, and I'm sure it can be useful for certain types of federated content management - I just don't see how it could ever make sense as a Wikipedia alternative.

[–] sab@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm currently experimenting with Seppo for my website, which is... not ready yet. So maybe not the greatest suggestion. But development is happening fast, and I like it for a couple of reasons.

  1. It's incredibly easy to install. Just upload a file, set permissions, and open it in the browser. I'm somewhat incompetent, so I appreciate that even though deploying WordPress is obviously not very difficult either.
  2. Content is stored in basic XML files, making it easy to access with just basic PHP and an XSLT stylesheet. Basically it easy to incorporate posts into your site however you want it.
  3. It federates with ActivityPub, so people can follow your blog directly and get the content directly into their feeds.
  4. It's lightweight - very little bullshit.

Basic functionality such as editing and deleting posts does not work yet, so it's absolutely not ready for primetime. But it's a project worth following, especially for those of us with an interest in the social web.

Edit: I guess this would be more if you wanted to create a basic website yourself, and add a tool for content management to it. I read the post a bit too quickly - if you're not interested in writing some code there are much better options to go for out there. Seppo I think is nice for those who actively want to tinker a bit. :)

view more: next ›