suzune

Linux admins know that you're worsening security when installing 3rd party stuff into kernel, so most of them tend to avoid it. And that's why no one noticed that Crowdstrike problem.

I've been self-hosting Postfix for several years and it's not difficult, if you're absolutely confident what you do. I don't recommend it if you don't know basic behaviors and internals of SMTP and relaying. Also you need to know how to secure your server so you don't get spammed a lot and getting hammered with brute force attacks.

From time to time you need to react to delivery problems. Most interesting one is perhaps Microsoft, which you need to ask to whitelist your server or your email won't be accepted.

The idea of "security software" is ridiculous overall. You buy a software to fix security problems in Windows and it violates the original product by inserting code into kernel code. You lose support by the original product vendor. And you think you're secure, even the whole stuff makes you forget that IT should be always fit in solving security/restorability problems even when everything else fails.

It seems you want to pick a fight with Germans.

I recently removed my 25Gbps PCIe dual port cards from my 2 servers because they were using 20W more. My entire rack including 2 UniFi PoE connections uses 90 W now (so 110 W just for having 25 Gpbs).

There is some heat from such cards, but usually it gets transported outside fine. The ones I bought did not come with a fan. I think you cannot operate them without one. The heat sinks get very hot.

You know posting a harmless remark by someone which in my opinion is not worth to be published is the core of the business of the yellow press.

We are talking about taste here. And some people have opinions. I just tried to reflect about this opinion.

Otherwise I don't really care how the bride looks like.

Many people see a violet/blue shade as more white. There are some chemicals that reflect ultraviolet light for this.

The point is, it looks cheap. Maybe that's what she meant. It's the same with chalk white teeth. They are also weird. There is a natural white like "angel white" that is often used. It's more yellowish and not that reflective.

I still don't really know what you mean. How a document looks like depends on you. I've got very many fonts available, much more than average Microsoft Office user has. And it's easier to use LibreOffice from my point of view, because it emphasizes structure. It looks much cleaner by default than MS Word. The only thing MS Word is better in is typesetting. LibreOffice simply fails to place letters properly.

Documents produced by office suites are not really good for publications. They are very annoying to handle, no matter if it's MS Office or Libre. The cheapest option to have something professional is LaTeX.

I recently replaced MacOS with Linux on a MacBook. And next year my last installation of Windows is going to be deleted. I absolutely hate this ad-infested crap they want to distribute.

Every single free operating system made sure in the 90s that not a single line from commercial OSes like Unix persists in the kernel and userland. The idea is Unix, but not the code.

I don't understand why ODT is complicated. It's a zipfile with inspectible data. The standard document is also not as vendor-specific as MS OOXML which is thousands of pages that everybody gave up upon.

It's because it's not the native format. How does MS Office show/edit ODT documents? Does it work better?