Maybe they mean low latency internet connections. This might need some better hardware installations on the side of the provider. This is probably not about net neutrality.
suzune
joined 10 months ago
No. This was Munich with its Limux project.
This part of Germany has supported open source software for a long time now. So this didn't come unexpected or without a decade long preparation.
The most important part is not the product here. Unfortunately, the people who work with the software decide. It's also a huge effort to educate all the people to use LibreOffice.
The nice thing is that MS Office moves entirely to the cloud and SaaS. Schleswig Holstein are the only one who will be prepared for the worst soon.
Did you use iperf? It makes sure that HDD/SSD is not the bottleneck.
You can also check the statistics and watch for uncommon errors. Or trace the connection with tcpdump.
The only problem is sync across devices. There are not many good options. Maybe it'll get better with DB support later.
Maybe it's not what you want to hear, but I was looking these types of apps, too, some time ago.
Then I noticed that most of the apps are useless for me and found an interesting type of apps that implement a "second brain". There are a few of them, but I chose Logseq.
Do they want to ban condensed water (fog) or something imaginary that does not exist?
Any errors on the interfaces? Does tcpdump show something interesting? What do the system logs say?
They found out that the biggest anti spike protein boost was at the 214th shot. So maybe all these weren't that useless...
So... it's a win for everyone?
I think default passwords are not even enough. There must be some additional fuckup unmentioned. Usually such devices don't expose the management interface publicly, so a password wouldn't be enough.
The article is about positive discrimination. The so-called critics fear that there is room for additional fees for for enhanced services, even the FCC clearly says that services should not be degraded and treated equally.
When FCC says that they never banned all prioritisation every "critic" is in state of alert. They ignore the fact that internet needs kinds of regulations to work properly on technical level and conflate the statement with the one above. FCC probably allows technical measures to regulate important cases of traffic shaping and even blocking when it's harmful for the service overall. This implies the fact that net neutrality can be guaranteed with these regulations.