sxan

joined 2 years ago
[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago

I respect your opinion on this, and will say only one more thing: having worked in the corporate software space for decades, you don't want their software. Most of it is utter crap. It's a consequence of finance having too much indirect influence, high turnover, a lot of really uninspired and mediocre developers, and a lack of the fundamentally evolutionary pressures that exist in OSS. The only thing corporations do better is marketting.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There are aseveral options, although some may be defunct.

Last time I looked into this, openMosix was the most interesting, affordable, general-purpose option. It turned several computers into one big virtual computer. I ran a very small, 3-node cluster for a time. The upside was that you could run almost anything on it - unlike most HPC solutions, it didn't require bespoke languages, libraries, or targetted solutions. The downside was performance; it turns out that to really take adventage of HPC, you really need to program for it. OpenMosix looks defunct now.

OpenPMIx looks to have taken up the torch from OpenMosix. It looks active; I have no specific knowledge about it.

tldp.org has some good required reading before you invest in this, in particular discussing the elephant in the room, networking latency. The short version is that, no matter how slow your computers, the bottleneck will still be the network. Unless you're willing to invest a lot into fiber and expensive, fast switches, it's probably not worth it.

slurm crosses the line into modern cluster job management, like you might find in a cloud provider like AWS, which is tye direction the non-supercomputer industry took when commodity MPI turned out to be not feasible. Warewolf is another version, sort of one foot in distributed container management and lightweight MPI. Both are pretty involved, more Beowulf than OpenMosix.

tldr, it's probably not worth it if you're looking for a cheap Beowulf cluster, because such a thing doesn't exist in any practical sense. Cost, and physics, get in the way. If you want to set up a data center, or some job farm like AWS or GCS, that's another matter. But it's a far cry from MPI.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lastly, although free alternatives are often technically superior to their closed-source competitors, at the end of the day

I am 100% in agreement with you here. While I'm not by any means a Libertarian, I prefer MIT and BSD licenses because they are truely free. The GPL is not: it removes freedoms. Now, you argue that limiting freedom can be a net good - we limit the freedom to rape and murder, and that's good. I don't agree that the freedoms the GPL removes are equivalent, and can indeed be harmful.

I don't mind others using the GPL, but I won't.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

nnn has this. If you have the right helper installed, it'll even show you pictures and movies.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

Databases are the definition of software dependancy hell. They exist in the zone of pain. I love Postgres; I hate administering Postgres.

[–] sxan@midwest.social -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

But the licence is chosen by the software author - unless that right to choose is taken away by a viral licence like the GPL, of course. In any case, I licence everything I write that I can as 3-clause BSD because I don't give a fuck. I wrote the software for me, and it costs me nothing if it's used by a shitty proprietary software stealer, or a noble OSS developer. Neither of them are paying me.

OSS should, is, and eventually will drive for-pay software to extinction, and it should do it through merit, not some legal trickery.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yes. Any one from Amazon will work. There are several Blueray ones; I believe I've even seen BD writers.

OP might be talking about something they can watch DVDs and Blueray disks on, though; in that case it might be more complex. I don't know if BD DRM complicates things.

[–] sxan@midwest.social -1 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Why? MIT is more liberal than GPL. Why is it a red flag?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Man, I do this all the time. snapper and grub-btrfs has enabled all kinds of amazing things. I'm so close to just doing:

$ sudo crontab -l
* * 3 * * pacman -Syu --no-confirm

I've got separate offline backups and rescue disks, but I'm pretty confident that grub-btrfs will let me recover pretty quickly.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Oh. That happens to me all the time. Like my wife will ask "did you take out the trash?" And I'll be all, "I thought I did." But clearly, I did not.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

So... you didn't read the article?

All of your speculation about versioning is correct. The subtitle of the article says:

This major release introduces a new calendar-based numbering scheme,

The second paragraph begins with:

Highlights of LibreOffice 24.2 include a new calendar-based numbering scheme (YY.M),

[–] sxan@midwest.social 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've been on btrfs for so many years, with nightly backups with restic, so I've been dragging my feet on snapper. Finally installed it a couple weeks ago, and while I opened the config, I don't think I changed anything. It's worked so well, and the Arch package was so well done, that I'd forgotten I had it installed until a few days later I noticed that it was taking snapshots every time before I installed something. It's shockingly good, and I don't understand why btrfs+snapper(+grub-btrfs) isn't the default on installs now.

view more: ‹ prev next ›