teawrecks

joined 1 year ago
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (7 children)

This one is clearly made to look like slack, which is great I need to try this out. Just wish someone would make one that looks like disc. And then matrix needs screensharing support.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does it work now? I tried it around a year ago and couldn't get voice to work at all. It even had a message saying they were in the process of rewriting their voice streaming backend, and the legacy path may just be broken.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Discord compatible bots run on whatever server you run them on, they're not owned or run by Discord.

It says the client is compatible with both space-bar and discord.com, so yeah, if you use it with discord, expect all the downsides of discord.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Lol ok, then I guess I didn't understand what the alternative would be when you suggested putting the OSes on different partitions.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They're definitely not suggesting having both OSes in the same partition (even though that is technically possible using winbtrfs, it is objectively an insane thing to do).

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 months ago

Looks like this is in the standard Fedora /etc/skel/.bashrc.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
Debian GNU/Linux 12 dullbananas-macbookpro161 tty1

dullbananas-macbookpro161 login:

What more do you need?!

Lol but seriously,

Remove: ...gnome-shell...

That'll do it.

You should consider setting up btrfs w/ Timeshift.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Thanks, good to know!

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I think their question is, what do you mean by "secure"? Because as the saying goes for internet services: usually, if you're not paying, you're not the customer, you're the product.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

Agreed. Anyone who thinks it's ok to just expose ssh on 22 to the internet has never looked at their logs. The port will be found in minutes, and be hammered by thousands of login attempts by multiple bots 24/7. Sure you can block repeat failed logins, but that list will just always be growing.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Normal for who? I wouldn't expose SSH on 22 to the internet unless you have someone whose full time job is monitoring it for security and keeping it up to date. There are a whole lotta downsides and virtually no upsides given that more secure alternatives have almost zero overhead.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago

Also, yesterday was Bandcamp Friday (they forgoe their cut and everything goes to the artist). The next two are Oct 4th and Dec 6th.

view more: ‹ prev next ›