treadful

joined 1 year ago
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

You're not alone.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the CA only signing your public key to prove identity/authority? I don't think the CA can magically MITM every cert they sign.

The impact is not serious enough to warrant a $1m entry fee, IMO. At best, someone could impersonate a site. They'd also have to get other things in line (e.g. DNS hijacking) to be at all successful anyway. And it's not like most people are authenticating certs themselves. They just trust browsers to trust CAs that vouch for you and prevents those scary browser warnings.

It doesn't improve encryption compared to a self-signed cert though.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (3 children)

They came up with the ACME protocol, so presumably somebody could. The real barrier to entry is the cost of getting into that certificate chain of trust. I have no idea why it's so difficult and expensive.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago

Remember they wanted like $75 for certs? The gall.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

'til the sweat

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

That sure would be something for the history books.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Apparently, Zuckerberg made the song for his wife, Priscilla. “‘Get Low’ was playing when I first met Priscilla at a college party, so every year we listen to it on our dating anniversary,” Zuckerberg wrote on Instagram.

Holy cringe, Batman!

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

That's fair, but hardly so aggressive that I'd call it a "crypto crackdown."

But it's hardly unexpected to see lawsuits around unsettled law. Everyone should expect more as we start settling case law and bringing crypto inline with existing law.

Also, wasn't it mostly centered around their non-exchange activities? Press release specifically mentions their "Staking-as-a-Service" offering. Not that I see anything wrong with it, but I could see how that could be considered a security. Doesn't really pass the Howey test.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 125 points 1 week ago (12 children)

What crackdown? The SEC has only charged actual scammers and they've "requested information" from the legitimate players to figure out how to proceed. Other than some bad calls by sanctioning software, there's hardly been anything considered a "crackdown."

 

Also, direct link to the artist's page about it. The Follower, 2023-2024

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have an intimate relationship with your grocer.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

If you want access to it at system-level, you can use pip install --user .... If you run scripts as your user it'll be as if it was installed as a system package.

Only use that if it's something you use to manage your system. If you're using this as a development environment, use venvs.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Same. Short and sweet.

 

Looks like it's so far just surface-level integration with Mastodon friends/DMs. But it's still nice seeing the fediverse embraced and integrated at all by what was once a walled garden.

 
  • Twitch on Friday will end the contracts for all members of its Safety Advisory Council, a resource made up of industry experts, streamers and moderators, who consulted on trust and safety issues.
  • The council has advised Twitch on “drafting new policies and policy updates,” “developing products and features to improve safety and moderation” and “protecting the interests of marginalized groups,” per a company webpage.
  • On May 6, council members were called into a meeting after receiving an email that all existing contracts would conclude on May 31, 2024, and that they would not receive payment for the second half of 2024.
view more: next ›