tuhriel

joined 1 year ago
[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 weeks ago

Probably a bit more polished UX (especially for not too tech-savy people)

but I'd say the biggest difference is integrated multidevice support, either via their cloud or selfhosted...

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago

In some Linux distributions it blocks you from installing system packages via pip, often there are then packages which can be installed via your distros package manager.

With arch for example:

sudo pacman -S python-'package'

Or, as others mentioned using venv.

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 months ago

Also, some tools have plugins to provide vim controls for them.

I know at least and use these:

There are probably more...

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For me, it's hardware support, i.e my laptops fingerprint sensor just isn't supported, for the speakers to work I had to find a script that remapped the speakers, multiple desktops (especially with different resolutions) are a pain.

But the killer at the moment is a good solution to manage and post process my raw photos. Went from Lightroom to On1 Photo RAW...unfortunately DarkTable is still not there yet. Also still missing the affinity suite on Linux :-(

Also, sadly these tools also don't run well in a VM

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

Same here, just stumbled across this issue yesterday when I tried to restructure my network to use .local

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

Same here, it's totally sufficient and never saw the reason to "upgrade" to the free business nodes

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 months ago

Jup, Im having an NTP issue on my win10 machine If you search for it you find the same 5 "solutions" from dozens of content farms.

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago

I'm coding them down as plantuml network code and render them using a selfhosted plantuml Server.

In the end my whole admin guide resides in a obsidian notebook as markdown There is even a plugin that renders plantuml code within obsidian

The nice thing: everything is just code and can be moved to any other tool (had my documentation in a local gitlab repo, but I swapped gitlab out for gitea)

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yep, I went in this direction...until I gave in during a bare metal install of something...

Docker is not hassle free but usually most setup guides for apps are much much easier with docker

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)
print("Hello World")

Save the file as script.py

And then execute it with

python3 script.py

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

Worth a try, will try it when Im back home

[–] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

I'll try that one thanks

 

Hi everyone

I'm fighting with a network issue, where my synology nas doesn't accept any connection from outside it's subnet.

So, here's my setup:

  • Unifi Infrastructure with three separated subnets:

    • default: xxx.xxx.2.0/24 - no vlan - pool with all "safe" devices (notebooks, mobiles, servers etc.)
    • IoT: xxx.xxx.83.0/24 - vlan 83 - here are all the IoT devices, including nvidia shield, multiple chromecast music devices etc.)
    • guest: xxx.xxx.20.0/20 - vlan 20 - quarantined guest wlan
    • dns server are locally hosted at xxx.xxx.2.42 and 43
  • my I got a new NAS and i designated my old DS214play (running DSM 7.1.1-42962 Update 6) as a Mediaserver that gets to live in the IoT net:

    • changed the ip from xxx.xxx.2.50 to xxx.xxx.83.50
    • updated the gateway and subnet
    • added the vlan tag 83 on the network port
    • updated the firewall to allow all necessary ports from and to the default network (so I can stream plex to my notebooks etc.)
  • The Firewall on the NAS is not activated

Issue:

  • My NAS doesn't accept any outside connections after moving it to the IoT subnet, neither from my default network nor the internet.

What I tried:

  • allowed full access between LAN and IoT subnet for the NAS.
  • tried it with another port -> same issue
  • connected another device to this port (and setup the same firewall rules) -> this one works fine.
  • checked the unifi firewall logs --> requests get sent from the nas and answers from the other device
  • checked logs of other devices (DNS, NetCat etc.) --> they receive the requests outside of the subnet, and return their anser but the NAS seems to block/ignore any incoming packages.

What I didn't try:

  • setting the VLAN id under "Network Interface" > "LAN" > "Enable VLAN(802.1Q)" since, as far as I understand, the Unifi VLAN implementation terminates the VLAN tag at the port of the switch (and all other devices work without specifying it locally)
  • fully reset the NAS

I'm completely stuck how to solve the issue, so I have moved the NAS back to the default net, but some use cases are not working properly that way, so I'd really like to move it to the IoT subnet. Does anybody have (has?) any hints or knows of some obscure settings which need to be updated? I'd be really grateful for any pointers.

view more: next ›