tyler

joined 1 year ago
[–] tyler@programming.dev 38 points 3 months ago
  1. Because it’s not human. We distinguish ourselves in everything, that’s why we think we’re special. The same applies to inventions, e.g. why monkeys can’t have a patent.
  2. Time. New “products” whether that be art, engineering, science, all take time for humans. So value is created with time, because it creates scarcity and demand.
  3. Talent. Due to the time factor, talent and practice are desired traits of a human. You mention that a talented human can do something in just a few days that might take someone else years, but it might only take them a few days because they spent years learning.
  4. Perfection. Striving for perfection is a human experience. A robot doing something perfect isn’t impressive, a human doing something perfect is amazing. Even the most amateur creator can strive for perfection.

Think about paintings vs prints. Paintings are much more valuable because they aren’t created as quickly as the prints are. Even the most amateur artwork is more valuable as a physical creation rather than a copy, like a child’s crayon drawing.

This even applies to digital art because the first instance of something is the most difficult thing to create, everything after that is then just a copy, and yes this does apply to some current Gen AI tech, but very soon that will no longer be the case.

This change from humans asking for something and having other humans create it to humans asking for something and having computers create it is a loss of our humanity, what makes us human.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah this is what OP wants. I run an unraid array with two pci expansion cards to add in 8 more drives. They’re more robust than an equivalent USB array (I think?) and allow for much higher speeds.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Ha I came here to suggest the nas killer too. I built the nas killer 3 and it’s been running great for years.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought that was Mercedes (in Nevada), unless you’re talking about sales outside of America.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

You’ve set up a scenario where one person no longer has to work and if they didn’t then why would they continue contributing to a company they get nothing from. Your scenario is disingenuous. Instead imagine a world where no one is paid. How many of those people would work doing what they are now vs stop working entirely. That’s the scenario where “people don’t want to work” truly matters.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

WM at least has rules that every load of trash must be in individual bags, and they must be tied. So you’re not getting that mix you’re talking about. Their goal (every landfill) is to make sure that nothing breaks down as it costs more to deal with (like leachate and methane).

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

The landfill stuff doesn’t eventually turn into dirt. They purposefully make sure that it’s wrapped in plastic in such a way that it never decomposes. Landfills are terrible.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 28 points 4 months ago

It was purposefully designed that way so it’s not a bug. It’s just bad design. Like they say at the end of the article, people view private vs public as a security boundary. So it’s incredibly surprising and unintuitive behavior that has clearly resulted in security breaches.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're implying they give you multiple. I hardly ever get multiple, pretty much only if I 'fail' the first one.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (9 children)

It knows they’re wrong which is why I don’t really think this article is accurate. Is it training if it already has the answers? Probably not.

view more: ‹ prev next ›