veniasilente

joined 1 year ago
[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago

Technically the media conglomerates should be the ones to be sued: they provide material to be pirated in the first place!

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can be ordered to log however.

Zero-knowledge protocols are important.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice try, fed.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Talking news and sharing links? There's lemmy for that!

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Nothing screams "capitalism!" louder than a geofencing over Anne Frank of all things.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Lemme see, US good, China bad?

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eh, I don’t know if it was illegitimate or not considering he allowed abuse to carry on on the platform for years and due to no encryption it was well known about.

Knife makers absolutely know people are using their tools to commit crimes, up to and even murder. Are they going to be held up until they do Something(TM) about it?

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

It's a licensing statement. Their post is CC-licensed.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Don't Google hold the keys to the kingdom on that one? I see it as unlikely that Signal adds support.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

They do stand up for themselves. Meaning, their bottom line.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I've never said Telegram is better. I'm just saying Matrix is also bad.

XMPP is the future.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Isn't matrix like an absolute non for privacy?

view more: ‹ prev next ›