this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
402 points (96.5% liked)

Greentext

4430 readers
908 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

It's more than that... I know you were joking but ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estimates_of_historical_world_population

Yeah it's estimated but it's a shit ton of people so it's more like 99.9%

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

You underestimate the effects of population growth. There was a lot of time in prehistory but the population at any given point was tiny compared to today.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

i remember an old article that said DNA shows that all current humans can be traced back to 7 women during the ice age.

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

And they were all neighbours in the same age and shared a WhatsApp group.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)