Games

16806 readers

867 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

Future Battlefield game aiming for ‘the most realistic destruction effects in the industry’ (www.videogameschronicle.com)

submitted 10 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

About fucking time. I started playing battlefield for the destruction and 2042 had less destruction than bad company 2

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Pretty much every BF since BC2 has had less destruction than BC2 and for good reason, flattening the entire map makes for very boring gameplay. IMO BF3 and BF4 hit the sweet spot of having enough destruction to have an impact while still maintaining some modicum of level design.

But now I don't even play battlefield and I probably won't return until the destruction is on par with the Finals.

load more comments (1 replies)