To be fair, the LiDAR was primarily used for parking. Still a stupid decision to remove it. There were plenty of values it provides...but those cars were never going to drive themselves even if they did have LiDAR.
III
joined 1 year ago
If they had work done, they might not be "naturally" beautiful. Probable better to just say "No, I don't believe you. You don't look like you had any work done."
Might I suggest you use the time machine you created to go back and talk yourself out of making the climate change reversal machine. I can think of nothing worse than for you to feel like you are stupid.
This reeks of selling games on a "pay per new game save" kind of move. If "replay" is a threat, how long until they move to eliminate that?
The book industry will be doing this with digital copies if they haven't already.
Given the industry's "you aren't buying, you are renting" mentality.... very, very optimistic.
Not voting for Harris doesn't make a person a Trump supporter. Their vote however does support Trump.
The problem with this way of thinking is that there are solutions to eliminate accidents even without eliminating self-driving cars. By dismissing the concern you are saying nothing more than it isn't worth exploring the kinds of improvements that will save lives.
Correction - Older Teslas had lidar, Musk demanded they be removed because they cut into his profits. Not a huge difference but it does show how much of a shitbag he is.
low visibility, including sun glare, fog and airborne dust
I also see a ton of accidents when the sun is in the sky or if it is dusty out. \s
Overlooking the concept of a failsafe? How did they get past the concept of the subscription model?
view more: next ›
It isn't a matter of which is better - you use both, and more.