this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
283 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (17 children)

Anyone know what loops are?

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago (16 children)
[–] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

but federated and open source

[–] ZaphodWilde42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I believe one of their terms tho is something sketch about your content and data.

[–] sgnl@midwest.social 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wanna source that? Cause I've been following loops a bit and haven't seen anything close to that. If anything it's the opposite.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They said they believe.

Only knowledge has sources; but beliefs sound cool.

I don't know why I used a semicolon there, but it's staying.

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey, believe in yourself, that semicolon belongs there if you believe it belongs there.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Believe in yourself!

Science: No.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] sgnl@midwest.social 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What exactly is a red flag there? It seems pretty boilerplate from a quick skim.

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe the section of concern was

Contributions: The Services may invite you to chat, contribute to, or participate in blogs, message boards, online forums, and other functionality during which you may create, submit, post, display, transmit, publish, distribute, or broadcast content and materials to us or through the Services, including but not limited to text, writings, video, audio, photographs, music, graphics, comments, reviews, rating suggestions, personal information, or other material ("Contributions"). Any Submission that is publicly posted shall also be treated as a Contribution.

You understand that Contributions may be viewable by other users of the Services and possibly through third-party websites.

When you post Contributions, you grant us a license (including use of your name, trademarks, and logos): By posting any Contributions, you grant us an unrestricted, unlimited, irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, royalty-free, fully-paid, worldwide right, and license to: use, copy, reproduce, distribute, sell, resell, publish, broadcast, retitle, store, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part), and exploit your Contributions (including, without limitation, your image, name, and voice) for any purpose, commercial, advertising, or otherwise, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, your Contributions, and to sublicense the licenses granted in this section. Our use and distribution may occur in any media formats and through any media channels.

This license includes our use of your name, company name, and franchise name, as applicable, and any of the trademarks, service marks, trade names, logos, and personal and commercial images you provide.

[–] sgnl@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It still looks pretty standard for a social media platform, it covers their bases for legalities. I can see how someone could read that and be concerned, but I'll bet https://mastodon.social/@dansup would reply if someone asked a question for clarification on mastodon, he's generally really good about that.

Edit Update: Seems like someone had similar concerns and dansup replied here: https://mstdn.social/@EdanOsborne/113413398742299770

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Terms of service/privacy policies would be on a per-instance basis.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

"All your content and data are belong to us"?

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)