this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
221 points (95.1% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3332 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

What does "Until Morale Improves" mean? I read the rest of the article but can't find what this is about.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm aware of what morale means in etymological and historical context. The article fails to elucidate what Zuckerberg meant with it.

The morale of who? The general populace? The owners of social media? LLM? And how will the improvement of morale stop ai slop?

Neither of those are explained yet are important for the article, as, you know, they put that in the title.

[–] Lampshade@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s a joke (from the author of the article and not a quote from Zuckerberg). Usually in the format of “xyz will continue until morale improves”, where xyz is something that is likely to reduce morale, thus implying that xyz will continue indefinitely.

In this case the morale is of those forced to consume meta’s ai slop, i.e facebook users.

An alternate worded headline would be: “AI content will continue on Facebook regardless of whether users like it”.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago

Aha ok, well that eluded me. Thanks for the explanation!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)