this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
96 points (95.3% liked)

Games

16806 readers
946 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 42 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Linux is just a source of exploits and cheats and nothing more, the developer said

Sure, and so is Windows. Is the difference then who will accept draconian anti-cheat?

[–] dave881@lemmy.world 25 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Assuming that there really is significant cheating on Linux clients, this can just be the company saying that there are not enough users to make development of more robust anti-cheat cost effective.

This is basically the same argument that software and hardware vendors have used for decades for why they won't support Linux

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My favourite from the old days was "we stopped/don't support/only support Ubuntu Linux because customer support is too tough across different systems".

[–] dave881@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. I'm not sure that this has changed much.

I suspect that was a large part of what drove the excitement for something like Valve's Proton. It was supposed to make it easier for studios to make games available across platforms, because they would. "just work" without having to put special effort in.

This sounds like the same sort of "We found out that the cost is not actually 0, and we want out. We can't say that though, so it's your fault"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)